Noteamscoals,butthatfigureisjusttheqaverageoverahypothetiumberofmatches。Thecrucialstepistoassesstheprobabilitiesof0,1,2,3,。。。goalsinasinglegame,aerusedthePoissondistribution。DataovermanyyearsshowthatthisisprettygoodatdesghowtheaumberofgoalstendstovaryarouhArsenal’sfigureof2。1,theogoalscameoutas12%,onegoalas26%,twogoalsas27%,threeas19%,andsoon。
DataforStokeputtheirmeanscoreas0。67goals。Thistraoa51%ogoals,a34%ceofjustonegoal,11%foals,andsoon。offaith,takethenumbersofgoalsscoredbyeachteamasiheprobabilityofa2-1smultiplyiheHometeamscorestwicebythecetheAwayteamsthiscase,27%*34%,around9%。
Inthisrobabilityofanypossiblescoreisestimated。ThentheprobabilitiesforeaeaywinarefoundfromtheAdditionLatheseparateprobabilitiesofallthescoresthatleadtothosethreerespectiveresults。ThisgaveArsenala72%ceofvictory,Stokehada10%gaceof18%fortheDraw。Thesthehighestprobability,at14%,>
Donotstheteheexactsthehighestprobabilityhappewideightoftheteswerethosethatwereidentifiedasbeilikely。Abettingman,laeyolikelyresult’andoneach‘predicted’exactscore,wouldhavesmiledhappilyasthematchsfolded。
Howwerecilea72%degreeofbeliefthatArsenalwouldwinthatmatchwithideasoffrequency,asthereisionofplayingthisgamehuimesandghowoftenArsenalwon?Recallhowwejudgedthereliabilityofaweatherforecasterwhehatthetomorrowis30%:
thereisoomorrow,itwilleitherrainoritwillnot。However,welookatalltheoswhenshegivesraina30%dcheckitsactualfrequency。Weshallbelieveherorrow,ornot,onthebasisofheroverallrecord。Withsoccermatches,wemakesimilarcalsfamesplayedovertheseason。Amoheremightbefortyorsowheresomeresultwasgivenaprobabilitycloseto72%–wecheckwhetherthe‘predicted’resultdidoccurwithafrequend72%,asawayofvalidatihods。
agamblerexpeoneybyusihepayoutpridheavilyonhowmuchisstakedoe,asumsareusuallystakedoheothertowisonaDrawtendnottoattraittedfans。IftheceofaDrawisassessedas25%,apriceisbetterthaoounitytoprofitisthere。
Dohebestbetisoewiththehighestpredictedprobability!
Footballresults(2)
&he2010soccerWorldalsbegan,statistiMcHalepublishedtheresultsofhiscals,whichallocatedtoeachofthe32teamssomenon-zeroprobabilityofwirophy。HemadeSpaies,albeitwithawinningly11。6%,followedbyBrazil,utat10。3%。
Toobtainthesefigures,McHaleusedanapproachsimilartothatdescribedaboveforeachmatch。However,hedidcaloftheprobabilitiesofthedistines,hereliedonaMonteulation。
Thus,foramatwhid’smeaat1。5goals,thePoissonmodelgivesa22%ogoals,a33%egoal,andsooer’sraorseleeofthevalues0,1,2,3,。。。riateprobabilities,ahingfland’soppoosomesimulatedscoresuchasa2-2draw。Similarsimulationsweremadeforeveryscheduledmatgtosimulatedgrouptables,atheknockoutstagesallthewaytothefinal。Thisprocesseated100,000times,andthenumberofsimulationsieamemergedasswasrecorded。Spain‘won’11,633times,hehe11。6%figureheLaweNumbers,asusual,isthejustifi。
AndSpaindidwin!robabilities‘correct’?Weoainwouldhavewon65%ofthetime,haditbeeomakeiioourhebestevidehismethodsmakegoodsebookmakersfolloathtosettheirinitialpayoutpricestoattraters。
Black-Scholes
Sharepriarketsfluesforreason。Ifthepriceis£5today,youdonotknoricewillbeh。However,you optihttobuy(orsell)thatshareatthe strike priceof£5。20atagiveime。If,atthattime,themarketpriceislessthan£5。20,youwillnotexerciseyouroptiontobuy,butifitisabovethatpriakeaninstantprofitbytakiion,
aelyselling。arksapplytoanoptioarefairpricesfortheseoptions?
FischerBladMyronScholesaddressedthisquestionin1973。Attheheartoftheirworktionthatthesharepricesvariedrandomly,butinaparticularwayrelatedtotheGaussiandistribution。Thefairpricesforbothbuyaioodepeprice,thepriceatwhichtheoptionwouldbeexercised,theiimeperiies,ailityoftheunderlyingshareprice(asmeasuredbythestaionoveraperiod):but notobywhichthesharepriceectedtoge!
Thislastpointmaybesurprising,butthatishowthingsworkout。Itisalsoquiteuseful,asitmeansthatwehaveoaddtoaybyestimatirendinprices。Ifyouwanttodiscoverthefairprieparticularoptiowareiswidelyavailable–justtype‘Black-Stoyourfavouriteseare。Givepridthestrikeprice,thefaircostofabuyoptionwouldiimeperier,orifieswerehigher,orifthevolatilityofthesharepricewerehigher。
Howdothethislastsentenceaccordwithyourintuitiodoesseemreasohelongeryouarepreparedtowait,thehighertheiheunderlyingshareprice,buttheothertwoclaimsaremoresubtle。Ailityalsoihepintheshareprice,butitalsohappehemeanpridtheformereffesouttobebigger。
&ilityismeasuredbylookingatthethesharepriceoverthe25daysihisshouldgiveenoughdataforaobereliable,butchsofariastobeirrelevantforts。Apoorestimateofthevolatilitywillleadtoanunreasonableprioption。
Amodelisonlyusefulwheioviolated。And,asFigure7shows,takingtheGaussiandistributionasamodelforpriceflupliesareallytinyprobabilityforcatastrophits,suchastheprigbymorethanthreeorfourstaioualprobabilityofsutissignifiderestimated,themodelisuhesitindicatesmayhavenosoundbasisatall。Theextreme-valuedistributioionedinChapter 4,havebeeoaddressthisproblem。
&folios
paniesAahexpeakeprofits。Withlowies,Aisexpectedtoreturn20%,whileBshouldreturn40%;withhighies,thepositionsarereversed–Ashouldgain40%,B20%。SupposeNickisarisk-averseior,whileMaryisrisk-attracted。
Iflhiesareseenasequallylikely,bothaylookequallyattractive,withameaurnof30%。Inacewiththeirrespectiveattitudestorisk,Nickcoulddividehisfundsequallybetweewopanies,andguara30%,whetherratesarehighorlow:Marypforonepaher,hopiagshemightgetonly20%。
SupposeBisreplapanyC,whichwillreturn10%withlowies,or50%ifratesarehigh–againanaverageof30%,likepanyB。ButnowmixingAandoseherior:NickprefersAalone,MaryputseverythingintoC。
&ialdifferethereturnsfromAaivelycorrelated–inswhenoneishigh,theothertereturnsforAaivelycorrelated–theydobetterether。‘easuredonas–1(totalion)to+1(totalpositivecorrelation)。Iftwoassetsfluvalueilyofeachother,theircorrelationwillbezero。
Risk-averseiorsareeodiversifytheirholdings,sothatabebalancedbygaiheywishtoholdivelycorrelatedassets。Butthereisaninescapablepieceoflogic:ifXisivelycorrelatedwithY,aivelycorrelatedwithZ,thenXandZwillteivelycorrelated!
However,allisnotlost。Amathematicalresult,duetoSalomonBoer,provesthatitisindeedpossibleforeachpairofassetsifoliotobeivelycorrelated;butthegreaterthenumberofassets,theharderitistoachievemutualion。